I read recently Sarah Bakewell’s delightful book, [amazon_link id=”009948515X” target=”_blank” ]How to Live: A Life of Montaigne in one question and twenty attempts at an answer[/amazon_link]. Then by chance today (possibly via @Storythings?) came across this quotation from his [amazon_link id=”0140446044″ target=”_blank” ]Complete Essays[/amazon_link]:
“I realize that if you ask people to account for “facts”, they usually spend more time finding reasons for them than finding out whether they are true. … They skip over the facts but carefully deduce inferences. They normally begin thus: “How does this come about?” But does it do so? That is what they ought to be asking.”
Quite so. The more time I spend thinking about it – and it’s quite a lot already – the more puzzling economic facts seem to be.
[amazon_image id=”009948515X” link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]How to Live: A Life of Montaigne in one question and twenty attempts at an answer[/amazon_image] [amazon_image id=”B002RI92VQ” link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]The Complete Essays[/amazon_image]
Pingback: On not skipping over facts | Homines Economici